From values to evidence
A manifesto says what we believe. Research asks whether it holds up. Satyavrat Nirala has spent the last several years building the frameworks that let these values be tested, not just declared.
HCI framework
A proposed framework, ideated by Satyavrat Nirala, that places human intelligence at the centre and asks technology to support judgement rather than replace it. Mishi is the first product built on this layer.
Empirical validation in progressCIS area of study
A proposed field of study, ideated by Satyavrat Nirala, that treats communication as attributed, method-tagged signals which can be audited and benchmarked. It asks how we know who said what, how, and how well.
ProposedUAHDF
The research backbone: a structured path from a question to competing models, evidence and falsification. It keeps uncertainty, failed predictions and alternative explanations visible.
Revision 2026-09Each value, given a way to be tested
Why this matters to education
The 2018 classroom showed that the values work when people practise them together. The next question is harder: how do we know? How does a teacher tell genuine understanding from a confident guess, or a group’s thinking from one loud voice?
The HCI framework and the CIS area of study are attempts to answer that honestly. They keep the learner’s own intelligence at the centre, make every contribution attributable, and refuse to let a machine make the final judgement about a person.
They are offered in the same spirit as the manifesto itself: as a beginning, open to challenge, and stronger for every person who tests them.
Status, stated plainly. UAHDF is a methodological framework. CIS is a proposed field of study. HCI is a proposed framework with empirical validation in progress. CIS and HCI are ideated by Satyavrat Nirala. Nothing here claims more than the evidence supports.